The Bush administration is going to be applying for a license to be able to dump nuclear waste 90 miles from las vegas. This project has already wasted billions of dollars and the facility has not been built. Should we just store this waste, or is there a better solution? Senator Reid has started cutting funding to the Department of Energy to prevent it from being able to build it. Is it fair to cut a department’s funding just to prevent it from doing one project? Should we focus more on a long term solution as opposed to a solution that puts nuclear waste within a short distance of a major city?
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080603/ap_on_go_ot/yucca_mountain;_ylt=AvLrbqY4fSYIThDO1auW7ECyFz4D
when bushes economy is gone i could afford to go there but storing waste near any city is retarded one more reason to ditch him
Of course not; but, I sure might vacation there after your candidate Barack gets soundly defeated in November! Might even have a drink that election night celebrating good judgment!References :
with Bush as president, I can’t even afford to drive to my local lake
References :
when bushes economy is gone i could afford to go there but storing waste near any city is retarded one more reason to ditch himReferences :
By the time Bush leaves office, no one will be able to afford to vacation in Las Vegas. If we were going to dump it in Alaska, the environmentalist would be screaming so loud, that the Polar Bears wouldn’t have to worry. But it’s OK to dump it next door to Humans. It’s OK to kill them. Somewhere, somehow, the American mentality went haywireReferences :